Civil Plaintiff

Justices Asked to Reverse Judge’s Order Halving $12.5M Verdict

Once again, Georgia’s Supreme Court justices have been asked to decide the scope of the state’s apportionment statute, this time pondering whether damages awarded under strict liability claims may be reduced by any amount deemed to have been the fault of the plaintiff.

Arguing via Zoom teleconference Tuesday morning, the lawyer for a man gravely injured when a defective brake caused him to crash his Suzuki motorcycle said the trial judge and Court of Appeals had brushed aside the state’s strict liability statute in chopping a $12.5 million verdict in half after a jury apportioned 49% of the blame to the motorcyclist.

The Court of Appeals decision essentially rewrote the 2005 apportionment statute to hold the victims of defective products liable for their own injuries, said Parks Chesin & Walbert partner David Walbert.

Read the source article at Law.com

    Leave a Review or Comment

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Back to top button