Civil Plaintiff

The Plaid Data Privacy Class Action Lawsuit Reaches a $58 Million Settlement

Consumers nationwide increasingly rely on modern fintech apps to do business, transfer and invest funds, and otherwise manage their finances electronically.  For those who have not been following the Plaid class action litigation, CPW previously covered it.  In re Plaid Inc. Privacy Litig., No. 20-3056 (N.D. Cal.).  As you might recall, Plaid has a platform for users to connect their bank accounts to payment apps. The plaintiffs in In re Plaid Inc. Privacy Litig. alleged that Plaid has “exploited its position as middleman” to obtain app users’ banking login credentials and then use that information to access and sell transaction histories, in the absence of app users’ consent.

The five actions were consolidated last year.  The Consolidated Class-Action Complaint alleged common law privacy claims as well as violation of federal and state privacy and consumer protection laws.  Plaid’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ claims was partially successful.  While some claims were dismissed, Plaintiffs’ claims for invasion of privacy, California Constitution (Article I, Section I), unjust enrichment, California Civil Code sections 1709 and 1710, and California Anti-Phishing Act of 2005, was denied.  After engaging in negotiations over a period of several months earlier this year, a settlement was reached between plaintiffs and Plaid based on papers filed with the court last week.  As summarized in the settlement papers, the proposed Settlement includes a non-reversionary $58 million cash fund.

Members of the class, which includes “all United States residents who own or owned one or more ‘Financial Accounts’ from January 1, 2013 to the date preliminary approval of the Settlement is granted,” will be eligible for a cash payout. [Note: “Financial Account” is defined as “a financial institution account (1) that Plaid accessed using the user’s login credentials and connected to a mobile or web-based fintech application that enables payments (including ACH payments) or other money transfers or (2) for which a user provided financial account login credentials to Plaid through Plaid Link.”]

Read the source article at Legal News & Business Law News

Leave a Review or Comment

Back to top button